Moncler Group | Annual Report 2024 Board of Directors’ Report 266 Moncler Group | Annual Report 2024 Board of Directors’ Report 267
•Prevention and mitigation of impacts
The risk analysis process is essential to prevent negative impacts
and def ine mitigation actions, such as prioritizing ethical-social
and environmental audit plans and integrating the results into
the selection process for new suppliers.
The ethical, social and environmental audits are in fact carried
out both on potential suppliers, to assess their suitability for
establishing a business relationship with the Group, and on
existing suppliers to verify ongoing compliance with applicable
laws and the principles outlined in the corporate Codes. For the
latter, any violation of the Group’s requirements constitutes a
contractual breach, granting Moncler and Stone Island the right
to request the immediate termination of the existing contract
in the event of serious non-compliance or, in less severe cases,
the implementation of a timely corrective action plan. In order
to ensure maximum impartiality, audits are regularly entrusted
to qualif ied, accredited third-party entities with recognized
expertise. The audits, regarding social aspects, focus on
verifying respect for fundamental human and labour rights,
with particular attention to the issues of forced labour, child
labour, freedom of association, working hours, guaranteed
minimum wage, and, not least, health and safety. The Group’s
proprietary checklist, used to perform audits, is regularly
updated to take account of changes in reference standards
and local and international regulations. It was developed
based on a benchmarking analysis of major industry-recognised
and multi-stakeholder standards and methodologies, including
SMETA3, the Responsible Business Alliance, amfori BSCI4
and other management systems and international initiatives.
This tool has been subsequently adapted to the specif icities
of the Group’s supply chains and is periodically reviewed with
the technical support of the International Labour Organization
(ILO) and certif ication and consulting companies (including
SGS, Control Union, IDFL and KPMG). The Group has
a
three-year audit plan aimed at ensuring that all façon
manufacturers and f inished product suppliers are audited
at least once every three years In 20222024 Moncler
conducted 794 ethical social and environmental audits
on both suppliers and subsuppliers accounting for 100
of the volumes assigned to outerwear façon manufacturers
93 of the volumes assigned to suppliers of other outerwear
processes dye houses printing works embroideries etc
100% of footwear and bag suppliers, 88% of tanneries, 97%
of volumes assigned to knitwear suppliers and soft accessories
suppliers and 96% of the 2024 turnover of pattern making
and prototyping suppliers.
Stone Island, which has a three-year ethical, social and
environmental audit plan to ensure the highest coverage of
suppliers in its supply chain, also carried out 380 ethical,
social and environmental audits during the same three-year
period (on both suppliers and sub-suppliers), equal to around
100% of the value of orders assigned to f inished products
suppliers and 99% of the value of orders assigned to
façon manufacturers.
Moreover, in 2024, both Brands also conducted ethical, social
and environmental audits on their main raw materials suppliers
representing 75% of total material purchases for Moncler
and 90% for Stone Island. In particular, with regard to the
down supply chain, 100% of Moncler’s suppliers were also
found to comply with the new human rights and environmental
compliance modules of f icially included in the DIST Protocol.
Those environmental and social modules were also applied to
Stone Island’s RDS-certif ied down supplier verif ication processes.
Lastly, ethical, social and environmental audits also continued
to be carried out on strategic service suppliers: logistic
platforms, external quality control platforms, providers of
services at Group sites and stores for which no material
non-compliance was identif ied.
These verif ication activities were accompanied by audits on
animal welfare and down traceability. See also pages 305–306.
3
Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit
4
Business Social Compliance Initiative
NUMBER Moncler Group
2022 2023 2024
Ethical social and environmental audits 239 389 546
Animal welfare and traceability DIST audits down supply chain 136 156 210
TOTAL 375 545 756
The increase in the number of ethical, social and environmental
audits in recent years is also attributable to the strengthening
of verif ication activities.
In 2024, with the ongoing goal of preventing impacts on suppliers’
workers and, at the same time, the potential risks for Moncler
and Stone Island, the Group’s procedure applied to the selection
process for new suppliers was updated. The evaluation of a new
supplier involves an on-site visit conducted by the quality team
to assess the supplier’s alignment with the Group’s quality
standards. After this technical analysis, the evaluation process
for new façon manufacturers and new f inished products
suppliers involves a document review of compliance and
f inancial aspects as well as a preliminary ethical, social and
environmental audit carried out by a third party. For raw
material suppliers, instead, the process requires the f illing in of
an environmental and social assessment questionnaire
supported by documentary evidence followed by an on-site audit.
The Group thus commits to not include in its supply chain
companies that do not comply with the Group’s quality standards
and basic ethical, social and environmental principles.
The results of the audit activities, including preliminary ones,
are regularly shared by the Sustainability and Internal Audit
Functions with the Operations & Supply Chain and Purchasing
& Procurement teams. This ongoing dialogue allows the latter
to review the management of relationships with suppliers, also
considering the potential risks and impacts on workers within
the supply chain.
With reference to wage practices, which is another key topic in
the fashion industry, in the Supplier Code of Conduct and in
the Human Rights Policy the Group recognises the importance of
ensuring wages that are aligned with the law or with binding
collective agreements in force in the countries where it
operates and, in any case, are adequate to the cost of living, the
employee’s basic needs, discretionary prof it, market benchmarks
and the type of professional performance. The Group indeed
requires its suppliers to of fer the workforce a fair wage level and
a career development path that ref lects knowledge skills
abilities professional experience as well as benef its and salary
and nonsalary incentives
Suppliers like the Group are expected to both provide all the
benef its required by the law including but not limited to social
security parental leave annual holidays and calendar holidays
and engage in regular social dialogue on compensationrelated
matters In addition all suppliers are required to full cover taxes
and other recruitment and hiring costs for workers including
migrant workers temporary workers and f ixedterm contracts
Since 2021 the Group with the support of a third party
has been conducting specif ic assessments on living wage for
both its own corporate sites and its suppliers with the aim of
covering 100 of its critical suppliers see also page 309
by 2025. In particular, Moncler partners with the Fair Wage
Network, an independent organisation dedicated to progressing
fair wage practices across global supply chains.
The methodology adopted by the Fair Wage Network involves
collaboration with companies and suppliers to assess wage
practices through questionnaires completed by both workers
and managers, identifying any problems and suggesting
improvement actions.
The Fair Wage Network assessment methodology is structured
around 12 dimensions, covering the entire spectrum of wage
indicators: the living wage is therefore only one of the
dimensions analysed, alongside other aspects and variables
of the wages practices and pay systems are evaluated such
as wage negotiation with workers’ representatives through
collective bargaining, the presence of grievance mechanisms
for complaints on remuneration issues, etc.. Another area of
the analysis involves comparing the results of the assessment
with industry and country-specif ic benchmarks.
The implementation of this analysis and the gradual extension
to other Group suppliers have been assessed and prioritised
on the basis of the risk prof ile associated with the geographical
location of the supplier and other factors, such as the presence
of collective labour agreements, which ensure dialogue and
respect for social and environmental aspects. In this regard,
approximately 70% of the Moncler Group’s suppliers are located
in Italy and are covered by collective bargaining agreements.
At the end of 2024, the percentage of “critical suppliers” (see also
page 309) assessed and involved in a living wage analysis,
carried out with the Fair Wage Network, was equal to 86%.
The analysis, which in the last three years has involved more
than 16,000 workers of the Group’s suppliers, conf irmed that
all of these workers receive remuneration in line with or above
the applicable local minimum wage according to current
regulations. In particular, the results show that more than 85%
of the workers involved in the assessment receive a salary
in line with the country-specif ic living wage (where possible,
regionspecif ic and parameterized according to specif ic
indicators for that country such as the average fertility rate
and the average number of people per household who receive
an income from work
For raw materials suppliers one lever that helps mitigate
potential human rights risks is the progressive introduction
of raw materials certif ied according to standards such as
for example the Responsible Wool Standard RWS the
Responsible Alpaca Standard RAS and the Responsible
Mohair Standard RMS These standards include criteria that
go beyond sole animal welfare and also cover social aspects
The Group also uses training and capacity building as tools to
prevent potential negative impacts and at the same time