Moncler Group | Annual Report 2024 Board of Directors’ Report 106 | ’
[–],
,
(),.
-,
,,,
.
,
,
’.
:,
.
,,
,
,.’,
–
.’
,,
-,
:,
;
,
’;,
-.
,,
.
’
:,
(,
),
.
,
,
,-,--
-
:
;
;
;,,
,
.
,
,-
,,
,-
.
,
.
,
.,
,
-.
-,
,
.
,“”()
().
,
,
.
,(),
,,
.
[GOV–5] Risk management and internal controls
over sustainability reporting
The Sustainability Statement was subjected to a series of both
internal controls, through procedures that involved the data
owners and the Sustainability Unit, and external controls by the
auditing f irm. In 2024, to strengthen and consolidate existing
p
ractices, the Moncler Group launched a project that led to the
def inition of a solid Internal Control System for Sustainability
Rep
orting. This system, developed in response to the requirements
of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS),
is a structured set of processes, tools and procedures designed
to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the sustainability
information included in the Group Sustainability Statement
r
equired by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive
(CSRD), as well as compliance with these standards.
The system has been designed in accordance with best practices
in the f ield of internal control, in particular taking
into
account the Internal Control Integrated Framework (CoSO
Framework ICRMS), which represents the benchmark
against which each component of the Moncler Group’s internal
control system is set, maintained and assessed. In addition,
the Internal Control System for Sustainability Reporting operates
in alignment with current regulations and corporate governance
best practices, fully integrating into the Group’s Internal Control
and Risk Management System.
The project, led by the Internal Audit Function with the support
of a specialised external company, included an initial phase
dedicated to the def inition of the governance model of the Internal
Control System for Sustainability Reporting. Subsequently,
the processes, roles and responsibilities, the operating model,
the supporting tools, the information f lows and the methods
of coordination between the Sustainability Unit and the other
corporate functions involved in the process of collecting
sustainability information were identif ied.
At the same time, the scope of application of the Internal
Control System for Sustainability Reporting was def ined
through an analysis based on the potential risk of misstatement
in reporting, developed on four assessment drivers: complexity8,
prioritymateriality of the topic9 ownership10 and potential impact
due to misstatement of the data This analysis has made
it possible to categorise the indicators subject to reporting into
three levels of risk high medium and low and to identify the
Group companies that contribute most signif icantly to reporting
The potential reporting risks relate to any inaccuracy and
incompleteness of the data collected any errors in the
calculation of the indicators and any lack of alignment with
ESRS requirements
Subsequently, with reference to the def ined scope, risk mitigation
controls were identif ied, namely Process Level Control, Entity
Level Control and Group Wide Control, which will be implemented
from 2025.
The risks and controls identif ied have been reported in the
“Risk
& Control Matrix”, which summarizes information related
to control design to assess their ef fectiveness and possible
integration into existing company procedures.
In addition, from 2025 the Internal Audit Function will
implement independent testing on the Internal Control System
f
or Sustainability Reporting, in line with the activities already
carried out for f inancial reporting, with the aim of ascertaining
the adequacy and correct functioning of the controls.
Finally, a summary report will be formalised, detailing the
results of the testing activities, any shortcomings in control
that are found and the relevant corrective actions. The Control,
Risks and Sustainability Committee will regularly review these
results, contributing to the constant improvement of the system.
With the aim of progressively increasing the level of control
over the sustainability reporting process, the Moncler Group
plans to extend the scope of the Internal Control System
for Sustainability Reporting and the number of reference
indicators in the coming years.
8
The level of complexity increases
when the process of collecting data
andor calculating the indicator requires
aggregations estimates or the use of
calculation formulas
9
Depending on Management expectations
analyses conducted on historical data
and industry publications
10
Widespread or concentrated